Doctors’ Opinions Don’t Overturn Travel Insurers’ Rules

By Milan Korcok, Editor, TravelinsuranceFile
Too often, travelers think their doctor’s “opinion” about their health is all it takes to qualify them for coverage or reverse a claim denial their insurer concludes was due to a pre-existing condition. And mostly, they are wrong. When seeking coverage, applicants have to play by the insurers’ rules.
Don’t make the mistake of thinking your doctor’s “clearance” to travel or “clean bill of health” is a guarantee you will be covered for travel insurance.
I have often heard clients complain that an insurer had been unfair in denying their claim for emergency medical services because they didn’t know their condition was pre-existing, or their doctor told them not to worry about it. And so, when asked to complete a medical questionnaire for travel insurance, they didn’t report their high blood pressure, or that slight heart murmur, or the shortness of breath they had been experiencing over the past few months.
Doctors don’t always tell their patients all the details about diagnostic tests or scans or other investigative procedures if they don’t consider them important or if there is nothing immediate they would do about them anyway. This isn’t necessarily bad judgment, but when information is withheld from a patient required to “completely and accurately” complete a medical application for insurance, it can have disastrous consequences for a client who risks having his claim denied for reasons of “non disclosure.”
Unfortunately, many family doctors know very little about travel insurance and its requirements.
And so though a doctor may consider a patient’s blood pressure, or diabetes, or gall stones “stable and controlled,” the insurer invariably has a definition by which stable and controlled will be measured. The physician may offer the subjective opinion that his patient’s condition is stable, but the insurer will consider it stable only if it has not revealed symptoms, or required treatment or a change in medication, or been referred for investigation. It is a definition based on measurable actions.
In the end, since it’s the insurer that’s going to pay the claim, or not, it’s insurer that defines pre-existing, or stable, or medical emergency, or acceptable risk.
You should have faith and trust in your doctor. But you should not be afraid or reticent about discussing
the requirements you must meet when applying for insurance. Insist on getting complete and accurate information about any tests or investigations. Tell your physician what you risk if you fail to disclose your medical condition to your insurer. Take the opportunity to educate your own physician. You might very well know more about travel insurance than he or she does. And always remember the golden rule: when the insurer pays the bills, the insurer sets the rules.
All travel insurers advertising on this site meet TravelinsuranceFile’s acceptability criteria for out-of-country health benefits for Canadian residents. You can buy online or get more information on each plan and its eligibility and disclosure requirements by visiting our Insurance Products section or click on the logos of insurers down the side of the homepage.

